ANSWER
SEO works to place your page in a list of results. AEO works to get your business named inside an answer. They share fundamentals, and in 2026 most service businesses need both, because buyers now use both paths and the two reward different things.
SEO asks what should rank. AEO asks who should be named. Ranking is a position you hold. Being named is a decision made fresh each time someone asks.
That difference changes the work. A ranking can be won with relevance and links. A recommendation has to survive a verification step first.
They overlap more than the marketing suggests, but they are not the same job.
A fast, well-structured, genuinely useful site helps both. So do reviews, real content, and a clean technical foundation. Google itself has pushed back on the idea that AEO is something entirely separate, and it has a point about the fundamentals.
The mistake is concluding that because the fundamentals overlap, nothing new is required. The verification layer is new, and it is the part most businesses fail.
If buyers still find you by browsing results and comparing, keep investing in SEO. If they increasingly ask an assistant and act on the answer, SEO alone will quietly stop working and you will not get a warning.
For most service businesses the honest answer is both, sequenced properly, with the verification work done first because it is cheaper and moves faster.
Related answers: what is AEO, how to show up in Google AI Overviews, and our AI visibility service.
The free audit measures both sides: your search foundation and whether AI names you when it matters.
Not well. Poor speed, broken structure and thin content hurt you in both. AEO builds on a working foundation, it does not replace one.
Some will. Ask them how they measure whether you get named in AI answers. If there is no answer to that, they are doing SEO and calling it AEO.
No. It is narrower. Branded, local and high-intent transactional searches still send real traffic. The volume around informational searches is what moved.